SEC Speaks: 2017 Enforcement and Exam Trends for Private Funds

At the recentSEC Speaks program, sponsored by PLI, senior SEC staff members provided valuable insight into the SECs 2017 priorities for private funds.  While the tenor of this years discussion seemed to focus more on retail investors, the staff discussed several topics that private fund advisers should keep in mind from both an enforcement and exam standpoint.

The SECs Asset Management Unit (AMU) Co-Chief Dabney ORiordan outlined several areas that the AMU will focus on this year.  As a general matter, ORiordan underscored that the structure of private funds can impair transparency for investors, which compounds risks in all of the areas that she discussed.  In particular, she noted the following areas of focus for private funds:

Valuation:This is a perennial priority for the SEC staff,as weve noted in the past.  Even in matters where the SEC does not challenge valuationsper se, the staff tends to focus on structural issues around valuation, such as failure to follow firm policies and procedures or breakdowns in controls.  For example, ORiordan noted recent matters where registered advisers failed to follow appropriate procedures in valuing illiquid bonds or thinly-traded mortgage-backed securities.  We also expect that the SEC will focus on valuation of shares in privately-held tech companies over the next year.

Undisclosed Fees:ORiordan noted that the AMU is highly focused on failures to adequately disclose fees or compensation that directly or indirectly benefit an adviser.  This focus is nothing new fee and expense allocations are classic examples of a potential conflict of interestbetween the adviser and the fund.

Trade Allocation:ORiordon noted that enforcement will look at trade allocation practices for private funds as well as retail client advisers.  The AMU is looking for situations where favorable trades are allocated to accounts where an adviser receives higher fees so-called cherry-picking or allocated in a manner inconsistent with guidelines disclosed to clients.

Gatekeepers:ORiordan also specifically mentioned gatekeepers entities such as auditors, prime brokers, custodians, administrators and marketers thatthe SEC has stated perform critical roles for advisers and private funds.  She indicated that when the SEC identifies a significant issue with an adviser or a fund, the AMU will evaluate whether the gatekeepers failed to perform their duties.  For example, theSEC last year charged an accounting firmwith conducting deficient surprise exams required under the custody rule.

Insider Trading:Joseph Sansone, Co-Chief of the Market Abuse Unit, stated that 78 different entities and individuals were charged with insider trading during 2016.  He devoted much of his discussion to cyber fraud issues, such as unauthorized hacking, but noted that both cyber fraud and traditional insider trading cases are investigated using similar data analytics to track patterns of suspicious trading.  As Sansone explained, by utilizing advanced data analytics, the staff is able to uncover patterns of trading among seemingly unafilliated traders, even where transactions are kept small to avoid detection.

It remains to be seen whether the incoming Commission will push the envelope further by pursuing new enforcement theories against private funds.  Regardless of the number of cases, however, the staff is likely to continue its focus on these types of cases under traditional theories undisclosed conflicts and violations of fiduciary duties.

The OCIE panel also highlighted three areas of focus from theSECs National Examination Program 2017 Examination Prioritiesannouncement published on January 12, 2017:

Newly-Registered Advisers:  The staffs focus on never-before-examined registrants will be expanded to all newly-registered investment advisers.

Public Pension Advisers:  The staff will focus on investment advisers to public pension plans and specifically how they: (i) manage conflicts of interest; (ii) adhere to fiduciary duties; (iii) comply with pay-to-play restrictions; and (iv) supervise the provision and receipt of gifts and entertainment.

Cybersecurity:  OCIE will continue its focus on cybersecurity, with an emphasis on ensuring that investment advisers cybersecurity policies and procedures are both sufficient and being followed, and that investment advisers have conducted a cybersecurity risk inventory.

In addition, the staff noted that there are now more than 12,000 investment advisers registered with the SEC, including over 300 new registrants since the November elections.  This trend demonstrates that the staff needs to continue to focus on higher level areas of concern, rather than taking a scattershot approach.

Jane Jarcho, OCIEs Deputy Director, stated that the staff was looking to find the sweet spot in terms in balancing examination effectiveness with efforts to reach as many registrants as possible.  As opposed to the routine cycle examinations of years past, the OCIE examination program is now more data-driven and risk-based.  The panel noted that over 100 examiners have shifted from other areas of OCIE into the agencys Investment Adviser / Investment Company (IA/IC) examination program, which now has over 600 staff members.  OCIE conducted more than 2,400 exams in 2016, which represented a 7-year high and a 20% increase over 2015, and is already ahead of that pace for 2017.  SEC examiners completed an average of 4.91 examinations during 2016 compared to 4.31 examinations in 2015 and 3.26 in 2014.

OCIE is also looking for additional ways to reach the registrant population; for example, using more risk alerts targeting specific areas of regulatory compliance.  The staff specifically noted therecent risk alert discussing the five most frequent compliance deficiencies identified in adviser exams.  For private fund advisers, this risk alert noted the SECs vigilance to inconsistencies between regulatory filings including Forms ADV, PF, and D, as well as concerns relating to the Compliance, Custody, Code of Ethics, and Books and Records Rules.

By subscribing to our blog, you acknowledge that you have read ourDisclaimer.

DC Circuit Opinion Reaffirms Fiduciary and Disclosure Obligations of Advisers While Rejecting SEC Finding of Willful Violations

Rent the Runway Walks into the Litigation Spotlight

Fraud Claims Against Startup Founder Involving Secondary Market Sales Demonstrate SEC Focus on Privately-Held Companies

Delaware Chancery Declines Post-Filing Use of Section 220 Books and Records Inspection Request

The Top Ten Regulatory and Litigation Risks for Private Funds in 2019

SEC Staff Announces 2019 OCIE Examination Priorities

Valuation of Illiquid Securities as a Focus of Recent Enforcement Actions

2018 Annual Review and 2019 Outlook Highlights Private Equity Fund Litigation Risk Areas

Proskauer Private Investment Funds Group Releases 2018 Annual Review and Outlook

WSJ Article on Geolocation Data Highlights Risks for Fund Managers

Proskauer is a leading international law firm focused on creating value. Our roots go back to 1875, when we were founded in New York City. With 725+ lawyers active in virtually every major market worldwide, we are recognized not only for our legal excellence, but also our dedication to client service.

Our clients include many of the worlds top companies, financial institutions, investment funds, not-for-profit institutions, governmental entities and other organizations across industries and borders. We also represent individuals in transactions and other matters.

In addition to New York, we have offices in Beijing, Boston, Chicago, Hong Kong, London, Los Angeles, Paris, São Paulo and Washington, D.C., as well as Boca Raton, Newark and New Orleans.

This Blog/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Law Blog

Government Contractor Compliance & Regulations